2.2 KiB
2.2 KiB
openfeign依据consul中的服务找到对应的pod的ip:port。蓝绿怎么做?
flowchart TD
subgraph Client Side
A[Spring Boot App with OpenFeign] -->|Call my-service| B[Spring Cloud LoadBalancer]
end
subgraph Consul
B -->|Query my-service instances| C[Consul Service Discovery]
C -->|Return instances with tags/meta| D[Instance List with version info]
end
subgraph K8s Cluster
D -->|Filter version=blue/green| E[Service Selector / LoadBalancer]
subgraph Blue Deployment
E --> F[Pod Blue 1]
E --> G[Pod Blue 2]
end
subgraph Green Deployment
E --> H[Pod Green 1]
E --> I[Pod Green 2]
end
end
%% Optional: Gateway / Ingress for traffic control
subgraph Gateway/Ingress Layer
J[Ingress / Service Mesh] -.-> E
J -->|Route 90% blue, 10% green| F
J -->|Route 90% blue, 10% green| H
end
❓ 蓝系统weight 0,绿系统100%,但蓝系统的kafka还在消费,topic被蓝系统消费掉了,会不会产生问题? 没有问题。如果蓝绿规划为同一消费者组,并且消费是密等的,被谁消费掉无所谓。
💡 最佳实践:
- 蓝绿切换时,不仅切换 HTTP 流量,还要 优雅下线旧版本 Kafka 消费器
- 消费逻辑保持幂等,避免蓝绿切换引发重复处理
redis: 共享 Redis + 蓝绿系统写入隔离
mysql:
flowchart TD
subgraph ClientSide
A[HTTP_Request] -->|flow_0_percent| B[Blue_System_old_version]
A -->|flow_100_percent| C[Green_System_new_version]
end
subgraph MySQLCluster
D[(MySQL_Primary_Cluster)]
end
%% Blue system behavior
B -->|finish_old_transactions| D
B -->|use_old_schema_fields| D
%% Green system behavior
C -->|handle_new_requests| D
C -->|use_new_schema_fields| D
%% Notes
subgraph Notes
N1[Blue system flow 0 but finishes old transactions to ensure data consistency]
N2[Blue/Green share MySQL, schema must be backward compatible]
N3[Write operations should be idempotent to avoid conflicts]
end